refactor: expose pure functions in DAVerifier #286
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update to Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib/verifier/DAVerifier.sol (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
src/lib/verifier/DAVerifier.sol (3)
- 97-106: The function
verifySharesToDataRootTupleRootcorrectly separates the verification of multi-row roots to data root tuple root from the verification of shares to data root tuple root proof. This separation aligns with the PR's objective. However, ensure that the separation does not introduce any redundancy or inefficiency in calling these verification functions.- 185-187: The function
verifyRowRootToDataRootTupleRootcorrectly implements the verification of a row/column root to the data root tuple root, leveraging theverifyRowRootToDataRootTupleRootProoffunction for the actual proof verification. This modular approach is commendable for separating concerns and enhancing code readability.- 190-200: The function
verifyRowRootToDataRootTupleRootProofis a pure function that verifies a row/column root proof to the data root tuple root. The implementation is straightforward and aligns with the PR's objective of separating proof verification from contract verification. Ensure that the encoding of the row root (abi.encodePacked) is consistent with how row roots are represented elsewhere in the system.Verification successful
The initial script aimed to verify the consistency of row root representation by searching for
abi.encodePackedusage withrowRootacross Solidity files. However, the script failed due to an unrecognized file type error for Solidity, indicating a potential issue with thergcommand's file type recognition.To address this and ensure a thorough verification, we'll adjust the approach by removing the file type specification, allowing
rgto search all files. This should bypass the file type recognition issue and enable us to properly search for instances ofabi.encodePackedused withrowRoot.
The verification process has confirmed that
abi.encodePackedis consistently used in conjunction withrowRootacross various files in the codebase, including both theDAVerifier.soland test files such asRollupInclusionProofs.t.solandDAVerifier.t.sol. This consistency in encoding the row root supports the initial review comment's emphasis on ensuring that the encoding of the row root (abi.encodePacked) aligns with how row roots are represented elsewhere in the system.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistency of row root representation rg --type solidity "abi.encodePacked" | grep -i "rowRoot"Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Adjusted verification for consistency of row root representation rg "abi.encodePacked" | grep -i "rowRoot"Length of output: 909
Overview
Closes #285
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit