Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: better way to delete tendermint config folder #1426

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2023

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Feb 27, 2023

Overview

Now that this function, apparently, reduces flakiness a lot (I haven't seen any on orchestrator-relayer repo). I guess we can put it in the start node cleanup so that users won't have to worry about it.

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

@rach-id rach-id added testing items that are strictly related to adding or extending test coverage CI item that directly relates to or modify the CI labels Feb 27, 2023
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Feb 27, 2023
@MSevey MSevey requested review from a team and MSevey and removed request for a team February 27, 2023 11:02
@rach-id rach-id merged commit 73c5fe7 into celestiaorg:main Feb 27, 2023
rach-id added a commit to rach-id/celestia-app that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2023
<!--
Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR.

Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before
submitting your
first PR.
-->

## Overview

<!--
Please provide an explanation of the PR, including the appropriate
context,
background, goal, and rationale. If there is an issue with this
information,
please provide a tl;dr and link the issue.
-->

Now that this function, apparently, reduces flakiness a lot (I haven't
seen any on orchestrator-relayer repo). I guess we can put it in the
start node cleanup so that users won't have to worry about it.

## Checklist

<!--
Please complete the checklist to ensure that the PR is ready to be
reviewed.

IMPORTANT:
PRs should be left in Draft until the below checklist is completed.
-->

- [ ] New and updated code has appropriate documentation
- [ ] New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
- [ ] Required CI checks are passing
- [ ] Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or
documentation updates
- [ ] Linked issues closed with keywords
rach-id added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
<!--
Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR.

Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before
submitting your
first PR.
-->

## Overview

<!--
Please provide an explanation of the PR, including the appropriate
context,
background, goal, and rationale. If there is an issue with this
information,
please provide a tl;dr and link the issue.
-->

Now that this function, apparently, reduces flakiness a lot (I haven't
seen any on orchestrator-relayer repo). I guess we can put it in the
start node cleanup so that users won't have to worry about it.

## Checklist

<!--
Please complete the checklist to ensure that the PR is ready to be
reviewed.

IMPORTANT:
PRs should be left in Draft until the below checklist is completed.
-->

- [ ] New and updated code has appropriate documentation
- [ ] New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
- [ ] Required CI checks are passing
- [ ] Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or
documentation updates
- [ ] Linked issues closed with keywords
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI item that directly relates to or modify the CI testing items that are strictly related to adding or extending test coverage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants