Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds Ethereum signatures verification + refactor the orchestrator/relayer for testing #314

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Apr 15, 2022

No description provided.

@rach-id rach-id marked this pull request as draft April 15, 2022 07:46
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 18, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (qgb-integration@76e2715). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##             qgb-integration     #314   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage                   ?   14.12%           
==================================================
  Files                      ?       50           
  Lines                      ?     9196           
  Branches                   ?        0           
==================================================
  Hits                       ?     1299           
  Misses                     ?     7806           
  Partials                   ?       91           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 76e2715...7e14fca. Read the comment docs.

@rach-id rach-id marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2022 12:30
@rach-id rach-id changed the title Testing qgb in simple conditions Preparations for QGB MVP Apr 19, 2022
@rach-id rach-id changed the title Preparations for QGB MVP Adds Ethereum signatures verification + refactor the orchestrator/relayer for testing Apr 19, 2022
@rach-id
Copy link
Member Author

rach-id commented Apr 19, 2022

@evan-forbes I think this PR can be merged so that the upcoming changes can be tracked in separate PRs.

Copy link
Member

@evan-forbes evan-forbes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool, nice additions, and sets us up for future changes

@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
4d63.com/gochecknoglobals v0.0.0-20201008074935-acfc0b28355a/go.mod h1:wfdC5ZjKSPr7CybKEcgJhUOgeAQW1+7WcyK8OvUilfo=
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is go.sum being modified?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because we keep adding new dependencies etc, I guess

x/qgb/abci.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@rach-id rach-id merged commit e48ccce into celestiaorg:qgb-integration Apr 20, 2022
@rach-id rach-id deleted the testing_qgb branch April 20, 2022 09:05
rach-id added a commit to rach-id/celestia-app that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
…ayer for testing (celestiaorg#314)

* temporary disables listening for valsets and query for latest valset instead

* app client listening for arbitrary events for valsets

* temporary disable signatures for testing

* temporarily disable threshold checks for relayer

* update count in end blocker

* fixes orchestrator listening to valset events

* fix orchestrator signatures + enables checks on msg_server + makes bridgeId a const

* fixes signature tests + adds new checks

* adds todo

* remove unnecessary comment

* adds todo

* adds todo

* moves the signer outside of the NewAppClient

* cosmetics

* updates singe node script to only create one validator

* uncomments the threshold for querying two third data commitment confirms

* linter checks + cosmetics fixes

* cosmetics

* removes todo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
4 participants