Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QGB Relayer add commitments check when relaying confirms #613

Merged

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Aug 12, 2022

Adds a check on the confirms' commitments before relaying them

@rach-id rach-id added the C: QGB label Aug 12, 2022
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Aug 12, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #613 (786f329) into qgb-integration (79b83d8) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           qgb-integration     #613   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            10.93%   10.93%           
================================================
  Files                   57       57           
  Lines                 9240     9240           
================================================
  Hits                  1010     1010           
  Misses                8127     8127           
  Partials               103      103           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@adlerjohn adlerjohn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link
Member

@evan-forbes evan-forbes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 👍

@rach-id
Copy link
Member Author

rach-id commented Aug 16, 2022

Will not merge until I get to the bottom of the commitments issue.

@rach-id
Copy link
Member Author

rach-id commented Aug 17, 2022

We could even increase the validations we do on the commitments before adding them to make the relayer smarter and not just keep sending transactions to the EVM chain that we know won't pass.
What do you think? Should we create an issue for that?

@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

We could even increase the validations we do on the commitments before adding them to make the relayer smarter and not just keep sending transactions to the EVM chain that we know won't pass.
What do you think? Should we create an issue for that?

hey sorry I missed this. Yeah, this sounds good! Perhaps this should be covered in ADR 005?

@rach-id rach-id merged commit 3bb9933 into celestiaorg:qgb-integration Aug 31, 2022
@rach-id rach-id deleted the check_confirms_when_relaying branch August 31, 2022 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants