QGB Feedback on PR #742

[rach-id]

This PR contains the feedback for the #742

[rach-id]

For the empty proto comments, they're required by proto linter:

{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":45,"start_column":1,"end_line":45,"end_column":30,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryParamsRequest\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":47,"start_column":1,"end_line":49,"end_column":2,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryParamsResponse\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":51,"start_column":1,"end_line":51,"end_column":68,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryAttestationRequestByNonceRequest\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":53,"start_column":1,"end_line":59,"end_column":2,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryAttestationRequestByNonceResponse\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":61,"start_column":1,"end_line":61,"end_column":46,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryLatestAttestationNonceRequest\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":63,"start_column":1,"end_line":63,"end_column":66,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryLatestAttestationNonceResponse\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":73,"start_column":1,"end_line":73,"end_column":43,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryLastUnbondingHeightRequest\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}
{"path":"proto/qgb/query.proto","start_line":75,"start_column":1,"end_line":75,"end_column":64,"type":"COMMENT_MESSAGE","message":"Message \"QueryLastUnbondingHeightResponse\" should have a non-empty comment for documentation."}

[evan-forbes]

my feedback was addressed, but will wait for approval from other reviewers for final approval

[rootulp]

LGTM thanks for addressing all the nits!