Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.0 #358

Open
tarcieri opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 13 comments
Open

Release 1.0 #358

tarcieri opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 13 comments

Comments

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

We should release 1.0! While there's an awful lot of stuff we could potentially fix before shipping a "1.0" release, I think the biggest thing we can do is ship the Actor/Cell split as 0.16 (#357) and work to fix everything that breaks as a result 😉

What about the rest of the stuff? Well, that's what 2.0 is for!

@krainboltgreene
Copy link

I've been using celluloid-io, and celluloid, for a bit now on my favorite personal project and I am totally ready to see this 1.0 (and beyond). It's amazing work!

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Member

👍!

@stephan-nordnes-eriksen
Copy link
Contributor

How about celluloid maybe use semantic versioning so that bundler and rubygems don't go bananas?

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

We certainly plan on using semantic versioning after 1.0

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Member

With a lot having changed lately, and some soulsearching having happened regarding some refactoring projects needing done, here's a tentative schedule suggestion to get us up to 1.0 in achievable time:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/celluloid-ruby/xUFSTGX1sKY/OoQI-jivoAIJ

@digitalextremist digitalextremist modified the milestones: 0.19.0, 1.0 Jun 6, 2016
@tarcieri tarcieri removed this from the 1.0 milestone Jan 15, 2019
@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as stale. If you are still interested in this issue, please reopen it.

@tarcieri tarcieri reopened this Jan 29, 2019
@digitalextremist
Copy link
Member

@tarcieri, if we can get together a succinct list of what's included in this milestone, some of us can iterate on this over the Spring until it's finally done. Or did something specific prompt reopening?

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

tarcieri commented Feb 5, 2019

I did a sweep of the open issues and closed this one accidentally

@arkhitekton
Copy link

All has been quiet in Gitter and here since January - has the second wind died down? Are downloads still crazy high? Is there hope of this being revived?

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

#789 is the place to start, unfortunately of all of the prospective interested people who said they'd triage that release, no one has seen it through so far

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Member

I've been looking at the angle of reworking the actor system by implementing a RINA messaging system between actors. We also have an approved Open Collective organization. Am here, watching

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

tarcieri commented Apr 28, 2019

I think the main thing Celluloid could benefit from, provided anyone wants to keep it going, is another release (#789), followed by several other releases of minor changes and bugfixes.

Where things started to wrong before was with changes that were too invasive, creating too many bugs.

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Member

Especially since I introduced most of those changes, I can start to budget a couple hours a week to Celluloid soon. Will start to make time as soon as I can

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants