Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deploy Faucet #54

Closed
5 tasks done
carterqw2 opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Deploy Faucet #54

carterqw2 opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@carterqw2
Copy link

carterqw2 commented Sep 26, 2023

Tasks

@carterqw2 carterqw2 self-assigned this Sep 26, 2023
@carterqw2 carterqw2 added this to the Barebones Testnet milestone Sep 26, 2023
@carterqw2 carterqw2 changed the title Faucet Deploy Faucet Sep 26, 2023
@carterqw2
Copy link
Author

@lvpeschke
Copy link

@carterqw2 the link in #54 (comment) is broken, could you explain the blocker?

@aaronmgdr
Copy link
Member

aaronmgdr commented Jun 10, 2024

@carterqw2 If we fund 0x22579CA45eE22E2E16dDF72D955D6cf4c767B0eF on the testnet with lots of celo (but not too much*) we can use existing setup. especially if the node url and chain id remain the same as alajores

  • want to avoid draining the faucet and not having a source of funds to top up.

@aaronmgdr
Copy link
Member

One TODO to add might be to add a low level alert on grafana when the faucet gets down to about 15,000 tokens. together with a way any eng at clabs can refill it

@aaronmgdr
Copy link
Member

After talking it turns out that

A) there is already alerting https://github.com/celo-org/devrel-x-product-clabs/issues/2.
B) since we are migrating instead of starting up from scratch that super faucet account will not exist
C) since MintCeloTokenSchedule still sends funds to carbonOffsetFund the faucet will stll recieve new funds each time that is called. so yay. nothing to do here

@lvpeschke
Copy link

@aaronmgdr is #81 still desirable? Should there be a task for updated documentation around the faucet?

@aaronmgdr
Copy link
Member

I never thought 81 was needed.

I dont see there being anything that must happen here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants