provide option for setting status on redirect from requires-scheme

[deliminator]

There is a TODO here:
https://github.com/cemerick/friend/blob/master/src/cemerick/friend.clj#L32

After researching this issue a little bit, I think the general opinion is that 301 (permanent redirect) plays better with some search engines.

One of the reasons I'm concerned about this is that google is currently indexing my http://... url rather than my https://... url. I think changing to 301 may solve this issue.

What do you think?

http://moz.com/learn/seo/redirection
http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/when-to-use-a-301-vs-302-redirect/
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-discussing-302-redirects/

[cemerick]

I would like to see this be an option on the (currently) 3-arg arity of the middleware fn, with the default providing the current behaviour. I suspect different users want/need 301 or 302, depending.

BTW, all you need to make the existing redirect call in the middleware a 302 is to assoc a :status of 302 (thereby avoiding having to add a new moved-permanently fn).

[deliminator]

How about this?

[cemerick]

Merged, thanks!

[deliminator]

Thanks as well!