Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(parsing): provide parsing engine #298

Conversation

RDWimmers
Copy link
Member

@RDWimmers RDWimmers commented Mar 14, 2023

close: #292

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4417662898

  • 5 of 5 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 87.455%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4415441047: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 962
Relevant Lines: 1100

💛 - Coveralls

@tversteeg tversteeg merged commit 2d07f3a into master Mar 14, 2023
@RDWimmers RDWimmers deleted the resolve(#292)_read_cpt_should_return_dedicated_exception_if_file_is_not_gef_or_xml branch March 15, 2023 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

read_cpt should return dedicated exception if file is not gef or xml
3 participants