Use Travis CI

[mayurkale22]

Fixes #507

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #536 into master will decrease coverage by 0.19%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #536     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   95.11%   94.92%   -0.2%     
=========================================
  Files         147      303    +156     
  Lines        9715    18544   +8829     
  Branches      527     1085    +558     
=========================================
+ Hits         9240    17602   +8362     
- Misses        475      942    +467

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/common/noop-logger.ts	16.66% <0%> (-3.34%)	⬇️
src/zpages-frontend/latency-bucket-boundaries.ts	68.65% <0%> (-2.99%)	⬇️
src/tags/propagation/binary-serializer.ts	95.23% <0%> (-1.13%)	⬇️
src/http-stats.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test-tag-map.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
src/binary-format.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test-no-record-span.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test-metric-producer-manager.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test-exporter-buffer.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test-utils.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
... and 182 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7af26c...fbe38ca. Read the comment docs.

[draffensperger]

I'm curious, what's the motivation for using Travis when we already have CircleCI for this repo?

[mayurkale22]

I'm curious, what's the motivation for using Travis when we already have CircleCI for this repo?

OpenTelemetry is also going to use TravisCI, to make things consistent I thought to use TravisCI here. Sounds good?

[draffensperger]

Makes sense, thanks for explaining!

[mayurkale22]

Makes sense, thanks for explaining!

I will get rid of CircleCI, TravisCI looks stable.

[aabmass]

Closing since Travis CI is not recommended for Google projects anymore. Also, OTel is using Github Actions most places now