Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CIP-82 to use CIP-88 namespace #89

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021
Merged

Update CIP-82 to use CIP-88 namespace #89

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

PaulLeCam
Copy link
Contributor

CIP-88 issue: #88

Copy link
Member

@oed oed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you include CIP-88 as well? I guess CIP-82 should state that it requires 88?

@PaulLeCam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes good idea, I added the requirement to the header.

@oed
Copy link
Member

oed commented Mar 1, 2021

But do you mind also adding CIP-88 as part of this PR? Would be good if it's finable in the INDEX.md if it's a requirement here.

@PaulLeCam
Copy link
Contributor Author

I could but I thought the flow would be first discussing/merging CIP 88 and then updating 82 and 85, no? Basically I'd like to make sure possible comments about 88 are addressed before making further changes to other CIPs.

I don't mind adding 88 in this PR if it makes things simpler, just want to make sure it doesn't slow the process down.

@oed
Copy link
Member

oed commented Mar 1, 2021

I think it's fine to merge drafts before much discussion. Drafts can always easily be updated with a new PR if needed.

@PaulLeCam PaulLeCam merged commit 2e65950 into main Mar 1, 2021
@PaulLeCam PaulLeCam deleted the cip-82-update branch March 1, 2021 13:45
@PaulLeCam PaulLeCam mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants