-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug when specify keyAlgorithm without an explicit keySize #1309
Conversation
Signed-off-by: James Munnelly <james@munnelly.eu>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: munnerz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/lgtm |
…release-0.6 Automated cherry pick of #1309
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
What this PR does / why we need it:
The previous logic here meant that if a user explicitly specified a keyAlgorithm but not keySize, a certificate would fail to be issued.
I've also updated some unit tests that had invalid input data, and added two more test cases to cover this patch.
Release note:
/kind bug
/milestone v0.6