-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate makefiles and CI/CD #221
Conversation
ebcca64
to
8b0a952
Compare
0e2ea0b
to
5f3b8cd
Compare
4ff4b8e
to
8acb17d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got a few questions: nothing major, but I'd like to understand more! I don't see any real blockers though.
# https://github.com/Azure/azure-workload-identity/releases | ||
TOOLS += azwi=v1.2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: Where's azwi coming from? I can't see it as currently being a dependency of istio-csr? Same question for vault I think and maybe others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This library is part of the make-file modules, so it shouldn't be used in this project specifically.
That being said, it is also not used in approver-policy (the only other library that uses makefile-modules today), so we actually don't really need it.
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ spec: | |||
path: {{ .Values.app.readinessProbe.path }} | |||
initialDelaySeconds: 3 | |||
periodSeconds: 7 | |||
command: ["cert-manager-istio-csr"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: Why this change? Does the entrypoint change in the built container?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think the entrypoint changes because we switch to build using ko.
Signed-off-by: Tim Ramlot <42113979+inteon@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
This is clearly reasonable! Thanks for this, I know it's tonnes of work!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: SgtCoDFish The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ref: cert-manager/makefile-modules#3