Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ManualAuthenticator for SimpleHTTP #502

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2015
Merged

ManualAuthenticator for SimpleHTTP #502

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2015

Conversation

kuba
Copy link
Contributor

@kuba kuba commented Jun 14, 2015

Inspired by quite popular [1] letsencrypt-nosudo [2] by @diafygi. Together with #440 and #473, it allows Let's Encrypt to be used without sudo (root) on the target machine (c.f. [3]). Possibly fixes #500.

Builds upon #501.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9707170
[2] https://github.com/diafygi/letsencrypt-nosudo
[3] https://groups.google.com/a/letsencrypt.org/forum/#!topic/client-dev/JAqxSvXlln4

kuba added 2 commits June 14, 2015 17:32
Inspired by quite popular [1] letsencrypt-nosudo [2] by
@diafygi. Together with certbot#440 and certbot#473, it allows Let's Encrypt to be
used without sudo (root) on the target machine (c.f. [3]). Possibly
fixes certbot#500.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9707170
[2] https://github.com/diafygi/letsencrypt-nosudo
[3] https://groups.google.com/a/letsencrypt.org/forum/#!topic/client-dev/JAqxSvXlln4
@jdkasten
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome work! Thanks!

jdkasten added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
ManualAuthenticator for SimpleHTTP
@jdkasten jdkasten merged commit 99ff33e into certbot:master Jun 19, 2015
@kuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

kuba commented Jun 19, 2015

ManualAuthenticator allows both simpleHTTP and simpleHTTPS, defaulting to the latter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is there an alternative way of proofing a webserver's property?
3 participants