You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now a geocache can be downloaded and stored on a list. And only on one list.
If I have a list of "the best caches in my area" and a list of "all the caches in my area", then the second list will not be complete, because some of the caches will be on the first list. And if I create a third list with "only caches with D>3 and T<5' then probably some of the caches on the first list will change to the third list which would be (actually: is) annoying. At least two of my lists would not be complete.
Would it be a great difficulty to have an m:n relationship between geocaches and lists?
Thank you for taking the time to think about it!
Christian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now a geocache can be downloaded and stored on a list. And only on one list.
If I have a list of "the best caches in my area" and a list of "all the caches in my area", then the second list will not be complete, because some of the caches will be on the first list. And if I create a third list with "only caches with D>3 and T<5' then probably some of the caches on the first list will change to the third list which would be (actually: is) annoying. At least two of my lists would not be complete.
Would it be a great difficulty to have an m:n relationship between geocaches and lists?
Thank you for taking the time to think about it!
Christian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: