[backport] interval_trigger using previous_epoch_detail #3151
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…previous-epoch-detail interval_trigger using previous_epoch_detail
delta2323
added
backport
delta2323
changed the title
|
Check travis |
niboshi
added
the
st:awaiting-author
delta2323
added
st:ready-for-review
and removed
st:awaiting-author
|
Closing, as we won't backport to v2 any more. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #2484
Be careful that this PR changes existing APIs. Specifically, this PR:
iter_per_epochargument with the default value toget_trainer_with_mock_updater.serializemethod toIntervalTrigger.As we declared in the contribution guide, we do not add any feature to revision updates basically. But as this PR introduced new features to fix bugs in stable versions. We propose to backport the PR. In order to make it clear that newly-added APIs are not documented (therefore not officially supported), we do not add documents to these APIs intentionally.