Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

typecheck quantifiers in composite types #61

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2018

Conversation

mlin
Copy link
Collaborator

@mlin mlin commented Dec 14, 2018

e.g. Array[Array[Int]] = [[:Int?:]]

Entailed pushing check_quant logic from Expr down into Type, and consolidating OptionalCoercion and NonemptyArrayCoercion linters into QuantityCoercion.

e.g. Array[Array[Int]] = [[:Int?:]]
Entailed pushing check_quant logic from Expr down into Type, and
consolidating OptionalCoercion and NonemptyArrayCoercion linters
into QuantityCoercion
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 14, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 283

  • 33 of 35 (94.29%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 94.84%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
WDL/Type.py 27 29 93.1%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 281: -0.07%
Covered Lines: 2040
Relevant Lines: 2151

💛 - Coveralls

@mlin mlin merged commit 8604969 into master Dec 14, 2018
@mlin mlin deleted the mlin-check-nested-quantifiers branch February 15, 2019 04:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants