feat: #4488 - Added sharding E2E tests in the CI

[charles-testco]

Reason for Change

• Shard E2E tests in the CI #4488

• added project matrix strategy so each browser is executed on a separate runner so that they run in parallel

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4489 (e43ff75) into main (121fb16) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head e43ff75 differs from pull request most recent head 9f0438c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9f0438c to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4489   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.75%   85.75%           
=======================================
  Files         171      171           
  Lines       12543    12543           
=======================================
  Hits        10756    10756           
  Misses       1787     1787           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[tihuan]

@charles-testco quick feedback -- in PR description we can drop prefix ZEN and just use #NNNN to directly link to the Github issue!

E.g., #4488 instead of #ZEN-4488

Thank you 👍

[tihuan]

The sharding is amazing! Thanks so much for adding it 🙏

And feels like we might be able to drop e2e-all and other related script commands, since it still uses the same amount of workers anyway?

Thanks again!

[charles-testco]

The sharding is amazing! Thanks so much for adding it 🙏

And feels like we might be able to drop e2e-all and other related script commands, since it still uses the same amount of workers anyway?

Thanks again!

Yes, we can remove them

[charles-testco]

The sharding is amazing! Thanks so much for adding it 🙏

And feels like we might be able to drop e2e-all and other related script commands, since it still uses the same amount of workers anyway?

Thanks again!

done

[ashin-czi]

LGTM! Thanks for speeding things up!

[charles-testco]

I am closing this PR and raise a new one as suggested by some people to resolve the stale status:

e2e-test Expected — Waiting for status to be reported