Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ugrades to plugin #40

Open
ruancmoral opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Ugrades to plugin #40

ruancmoral opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@ruancmoral
Copy link

As it is today, the plugin is looks very limited.

Some cons that I found using it:

  • Cannot filter multiple experiments by 'name' in the annotation (can only select one or all experiments)
  • Cannot filter multiple experiments by 'kind' (only one possibility)
  • When using Worflows, all finished experiments go to "archives" after running, so I can't see them in Grafana Dashboard (the plugin only select 'active' experiments)
  • Maybe the possibility to filter by 'labelSelector' so I can see in the service monitoring when it recieved some Chaos?

Do you guys have any plans to improve the plugin?

@g1eny0ung g1eny0ung added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jun 28, 2022
@g1eny0ung
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the late reply. These are very helpful for us.

  • Cannot filter multiple experiments by 'name' in the annotation (can only select one or all experiments)
  • Cannot filter multiple experiments by 'kind' (only one possibility)

Indeed, if you're looking for a more flexible way to filter, you currently have to create multiple annotations or variables to solve this problem.

This flexible filtering approach requires API-level support. I will try to add this as an enhancement in the future.

When using Worflows, all finished experiments go to "archives" after running, so I can't see them in Grafana Dashboard (the plugin only select 'active' experiments)

Yes. In our minds, an archive is an experiment that has already been done, so we decided not to go ahead and show them on grafana (But it can be done).

I don't think I would make this feature a high-priority thing to do. 😃

Maybe the possibility to filter by 'labelSelector' so I can see in the service monitoring when it recieved some Chaos?

This is a great idea. It would also improve the flexibility of the API!

I will go through and document these optimizations in the chaos mesh.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants