Change name of the Code Comittee to Software Comittee #4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rationale: We've been using the name Software Committee for a while (at least in some context), and my feeling is the word "software" is much less ambiguous than "code", thus making it more clear what the TC is for. Note: According to the charter, this modification needs two thirds of the GB, so this is really a proposal to be discussed in the next GB meeting. Comments to this pull request are welcome in advance to that discussion.
|
I'm not on the Governing Board, but I support this proposal. +1 |
|
No worries, I got your back :-)
|
|
OK, this was approved in the board meeting, so merging... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale: We've been using the name Software Committee for a while (at least in some context), and my feeling is the word "software" is much less ambiguous than "code", thus making it more clear what the TC is for.
Note: According to the charter, this modification needs two thirds of the GB, so this is really a proposal to be discussed in the next GB meeting. Comments to this pull request are welcome in advance to that discussion.