Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change lodash dependencies to ^3.2.0 #655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 27, 2015
Merged

Change lodash dependencies to ^3.2.0 #655

merged 1 commit into from Feb 27, 2015

Conversation

SamyPesse
Copy link
Contributor

I know I made a PR for this a few days ago (#653). But I think ~3.1.0 is too strict considering what cheerio is using from lodash (core methods): _.each, _.forEach, _.map, _.defaults and _.merge; these methods are not planned to change in the 3.x.x or anytime soon.

Being less strict is better for people using it with something like browserify (reduce bundle size by avoiding having 2 versions of lodash).

For example, from 3.1.0 to 3.2.0, jdalton fixed some "important" issues in non-core methods (chaining): lodash/lodash#955 and lodash/lodash#958.

Another, maybe better and even less strict, solution can be: 3.x.x || 2.4.x

Let me know what you think.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.19% when pulling a5122a6 on SamyPesse:patch-1 into c958962 on cheeriojs:master.

@SamyPesse
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fb55 any news on when the next version of cheerio will be released ?

@SamyPesse
Copy link
Contributor Author

?

fb55 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2015
Change lodash dependencies to ^3.2.0
@fb55 fb55 merged commit d41d895 into cheeriojs:master Feb 27, 2015
@fb55
Copy link
Member

fb55 commented Feb 27, 2015

There are some prs I'd like to see merged before publishing a new version (eg. #631 and #647). I'm hesitant to go ahead with them without an okay from @matthewmueller, @jugglinmike or @davidchambers.

@jugglinmike
Copy link
Member

@fb55 sorry about those lingering ones--I'll take a look this weekend.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants