Adding check in system-user verify flow to verify HAB uid

[ArvinthC3000]

🔩 Description: What code changed, and why?

As an automate HA user, when I use File system as backup, then while running verify flow, I should also verify if the hab uid is same across all the remote nodes. If not verify check should show the error.

• This is applicable only when the backup type is efs (AWS) or file_system (on-prem)
• Check should be ignored when s3 or object storage is chosen.
• Check should be ignored when no backup type is chosen

⛓️ Related Resources

Jira ticket: https://chefio.atlassian.net/browse/CHEF-6390

👍 Definition of Done

👟 How to Build and Test the Change

✅ Checklist

All PRs must tick these:

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• All commits signed-off for the Developer Certification of Origin.

With occasional exceptions, all PRs from Progress employees must tick these:

• Is the code clear? (complicated code or lots of comments--subdivide and use well-named methods, meaningful variable names, etc.)
• Consistency checked? (user notifications, user prompts, visual patterns, code patterns, variable names)
• Repeated code blocks eliminated? (adapt and reuse existing components, blocks, functions, etc.)
• Spelling, grammar, typos checked? (at a minimum use make spell in any component directory)
• Code well-formatted? (indents, line breaks, etc. improve rather than hinder readability)

All PRs from Progress employees should tick these if appropriate:

• Tests added/updated? (all new code needs new tests)
• Docs added/updated? (all customer-facing changes)

Please add a note next to any checkbox above if you are NOT ticking it.

📷 Screenshots, if applicable

Screentshot: Verify check for hab uid in remote nodes - faliure
Demo Video: Verify check for hab uid in remote nodes

[netlify]

👷 Deploy Preview for chef-automate processing.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	47b3a03
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/chef-automate/deploys/655c41375102890008ab7ee3

[punitmundra]

i am approving the pr just resolve the 2 comments

[sonarqube-for-infrastructure-prod]

SonarQube Quality Gate

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
2 Code Smells

96.4% Coverage
0.0% Duplication