Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation issue #5

Open
anhvth opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Implementation issue #5

anhvth opened this issue Jan 15, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@anhvth
Copy link

anhvth commented Jan 15, 2020

I used this config [e2e_mask_rcnn_R_101_FPN_4x_voc_coco_aug_cocostyle] to retrain and seems like the model is not trained correctly with the two new losses for mask ?, After training the result for masks are just rectangle masks, i'm wondering if implementation is the same wit
3
17

h the one in your paper?

@chuong98
Copy link

chuong98 commented Jan 15, 2020

These masks are almost identical to the bounding boxes. I wonder what other magic tricks the authors have used to make instance masks as tight as reported in the paper???

@chengchunhsu
Copy link
Owner

Hi vnbot2,

The result seems weird. I have checked the result of the previous experiments and I am absolutely sure that is not how my result looks like. I will run the whole experiment again based on the released code to check if there is any problem later.

Moreover, I noticed that the labels in the figures are all wrong(e.g., classify the cat as a truck). Can you provide more details about your training dataset, annotation format, training iterations, and training log?
It could be helpful for debugging.

I will let you know if I found anything.
Thanks!

Cheng-Chun

@sydney0zq
Copy link

sydney0zq commented Mar 27, 2020

Hi, @chengchunhsu @vnbot2, we run the released code on VOC 2012 dataset (not the augmented version), and the results seem to be reasonable. However, we have not found the code the compute the mask AP. Could you please update your evaluation code?

And if possible, could you please provide your VOCSBD json annotation file? We find the json download link is not available.

Thank you!

@fiona-lxd
Copy link

fiona-lxd commented Apr 27, 2020

Hi, @chengchunhsu @vnbot2, we run the released code on VOC 2012 dataset (not the augmented version), and the results seem to be reasonable. However, we have not found the code the compute the mask AP. Could you please update your evaluation code?

And if possible, could you please provide your VOCSBD json annotation file? We find the json download link is not available.

Thank you!

Same request. Besides, I run the code with sh train_voc_aug.sh and it converges to loss ~0.13. But the test mAP is about 0. Is there any insights?
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants