Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a bugs section and added the bug in pd.merge() #7

Closed

Conversation

umeshG34
Copy link

  1. Made minor spelling corrections.
  2. Added a 7. Bugs section and added 7.1 pd.merge() joins over np.nan and None as the first bug.

Please review and let me know of any changes you would like me to make.
Thank you!

@umeshG34 umeshG34 marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2020 09:02
@umeshG34 umeshG34 changed the title Added a bugs section and added Added a bugs section and added the bug in pd.merge() Nov 18, 2020
Copy link
Owner

@chiphuyen chiphuyen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for contributing! There are several comments in the PR, but here are two major ones:

  1. Can you make it into 2 separate PRs since they do different things: one for typos and the other for adding the known bugs?
  2. Try not to re-run cells that you didn't update to avoid overwriting the existing results.

Cheers,

just-pandas-things.ipynb Show resolved Hide resolved
just-pandas-things.ipynb Show resolved Hide resolved
just-pandas-things.ipynb Show resolved Hide resolved
just-pandas-things.ipynb Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -3360,6 +3360,308 @@
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"---\n",
"## 7. Bugs\n",
"### 7.1 `pd.merge()` joins over np.nan and None\n",
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: escape np.NaN and None for consistency

@umeshG34 umeshG34 closed this Nov 21, 2020
@umeshG34 umeshG34 deleted the pd.merge_bug_+_minor_corrections branch November 21, 2020 08:39
@umeshG34
Copy link
Author

Splitting this PR into #8 and #9 . All the feedback comments done there. Thank you for taking the time to review this Chip!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants