You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I have a question regarding ISA extension group G (IMFAD).
Will there be support for remainder ?
If not what is the suggested practice for adding support for them ?
Thank you,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, there's plan to support the FAD extension. Here's preferred the way to do it:
Create a development branch for each ISA extensions
File a bug for each ISA extensions
List all the features required to support this new ISA, collaborators can participate in the development by adding feature requirements, review PR, implement features etc.
Finish all development work under development branch before merging to the mainline.
I will go ahead to create a development branch for A extension first. Regarding the complexity , I think A,D are relatively easy, may take a couple of weeks to implement. F extension will take more time, presumably a month or two.
Hi,
I have a question regarding ISA extension group G (IMFAD).
Will there be support for remainder ?
If not what is the suggested practice for adding support for them ?
Thank you,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: