Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for running cinst and friends in cygwin shells #3

Closed
mcandre opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for running cinst and friends in cygwin shells #3

mcandre opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@mcandre
Copy link

mcandre commented Aug 19, 2013

Many developer tools require bash-style shells in order to function, but chocolatey currently is only available in batch form.

Could we add support for cygwin shells? E.g. by dropping in a shell script in addition to each batch file, e.g. https://gist.github.com/mcandre/5467825.

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Contributor

It works for me. Try cup chocolatey -pre

Let me know if the new version works for you.

On Monday, August 19, 2013, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:

Many developer tools require bash-style shells in order to function, but
chocolatey currently is only available in batch form.

Could we add support for cygwin shells? E.g. by dropping in a shell script
in addition to each batch file, e.g.
https://gist.github.com/mcandre/5467825.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3
.


Rob
"Be passionate in all you do"

http://devlicio.us/blogs/rob_reynolds
http://ferventcoder.com
http://twitter.com/ferventcoder

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Contributor

In case this is ambiguous, the work has already been done is in a prerelease pkg.

@mcandre
Copy link
Author

mcandre commented Nov 12, 2013

@ferventcoder I'm so glad you guys work hard on Chocolatey! It makes my development work a lot easier, and I've been encouraging my fellow Windows developers to give it a try.

gep13 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants