Performance Results

[Akkuma]

results for 10000 parallel executions, 1 ms per I/O op

file                                 time(ms)  memory(MB)
promises-creed-generator.js               197       27.93
callbacks-baseline.js                     199       36.64
promises-bluebird-generator.js            263       32.20
promises-cujojs-when-generator.js         270       42.90
promises-creed.js                         342       52.79
promises-creed-algebraic.js               345       52.12
promises-bluebird.js                      365       50.46
promises-cujojs-when.js                   423       65.66
promises-tildeio-rsvp.js                  489       88.94
callbacks-caolan-async-waterfall.js       660      109.15
promises-ecmascript6-native.js            923      184.71
generators-tj-co.js                       982      147.02
promises-plite.js                        1774      264.17

Platform info:
Darwin 15.4.0 x64
Node.JS 5.10.1
V8 4.6.85.31
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4870HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz × 8

This is using https://github.com/Akkuma/creed/perf which itself is based upon bluebird's benchmark with node performance.js ./doxbee-sequential/callbacks-baseline.js ./doxbee-sequential/callbacks-caolan-async-waterfall.js ./doxbee-sequential/generators-tj-co.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-bluebird-generator.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-bluebird.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-creed-algebraic.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-creed-generator.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-creed.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-cujojs-when-generator.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-cujojs-when.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-ecmascript6-native.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-tildeio-rsvp.js ./doxbee-sequential/promises-plite.js -n 10000 -t 1 and using -p 25 results are pretty similar for plite

[chrisdavies]

Well, that sucks. I also ran into an interesting bug in production recently that I have yet to repro in a meaningful way. I may just deprecate this library.