Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

References to so far non-defined statements #9

Closed
xylomorph opened this issue Apr 12, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

References to so far non-defined statements #9

xylomorph opened this issue Apr 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@xylomorph
Copy link

Also das geht natürlich:

[p]: p
   - [notp]: notp


<A1>: Argument 1

(1) pr
----
(2) [notp]

Aber dann werden in der map p und notp immer angezeigt, was schnell zum Pfeilchaos führt. Es scheint ja so zu sein, dass Statements nicht in der Karte als Thesenkasten landen, wenn sie nur innerhalb von Argument def. werden und nicht außerhalb referenziert werden. Daher bräuchte ich für obigen Fall sowas ähnliches, wie

[p]: p


<A1>: Argument 1

(1) pr
----
(2) [!p]: notp
@xylomorph
Copy link
Author

Ok, erledigt (zumindest für diesen Anwendungsfall). Wir haben ja:

[p]: p

<A1>: Argument 1

(1) pr
----
(2) [notp]: not p
   >< [p]

@christianvoigt
Copy link
Owner

Please try out the "settings" in the map view of the browser tool (click the button at the bottom).

The map export currently offers 5 different methods by which the statements are selected that will be represented as nodes in the map.

You can also use these different methods in the argdown cli by using the -m option:

argdown dot -m [all|titled|roots|statement-trees|with-relations]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants