-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue #61 (6) Examine result file of dedupe
in test
#63
Issue #61 (6) Examine result file of dedupe
in test
#63
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #63 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.4% 82.62% +0.22%
==========================================
Files 56 55 -1
Lines 3285 3281 -4
Branches 363 362 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 2707 2711 +4
+ Misses 215 208 -7
+ Partials 363 362 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Umm... small.bam
seems to have no duplicates because contents of small.bam
and small.deduped.bam
are totally same. Although This behavior is right, I think small.bam
is not appropriate for dedupe
test.
Thanks for review, I changes to new bam files based on another dedupe test. |
Great:) Thank you. |
No description provided.