Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend cljam.core reader/writer functions. #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 15, 2017

Conversation

alumi
Copy link
Member

@alumi alumi commented May 15, 2017

Current cljam.core supports only SAM, BAM and FASTA files.

This PR adds other readers/writers to cljam.core.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #75 into master will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 96.29%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #75      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.92%   83.04%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          59       59              
  Lines        3795     3833      +38     
  Branches      409      409              
==========================================
+ Hits         3147     3183      +36     
- Misses        239      241       +2     
  Partials      409      409
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/cljam/core.clj 96.66% <96.29%> (+5.75%) ⬆️
src/cljam/sorter.clj 76.72% <0%> (-2.59%) ⬇️
src/cljam/convert.clj 61.29% <0%> (+3.22%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 76c315e...b5ce22c. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@totakke totakke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job. Thanks.

@totakke totakke merged commit 6cb30ea into master May 15, 2017
@totakke totakke deleted the feature/core-reader-writer branch May 15, 2017 09:46
@alumi
Copy link
Member Author

alumi commented May 15, 2017

Thank you for the reviewing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants