Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complex Forms have incorrect limit #46

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Complex Forms have incorrect limit #46

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Karma Gen
2. Human
3. Buy Technomancer
4. Buy 2 complex forms

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

You should only be able to buy 1 complex form, it is limited by the runner's 
log score. Instead when you try to add another CF it will not allow and states 
max CF is twice the users log.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

5.158.1
Windows 10


Original issue reported on code.google.com by Chris.Tu...@gmail.com on 11 Mar 2015 at 3:42

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

alter code to => LOG.value. Is probably currently =>LOG.value*2.

Original comment by richard....@gmail.com on 11 Mar 2015 at 9:31

  • Changed state: Started

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Fixed to RES*2 in 5.159.

Original comment by chummer5isalive on 12 Mar 2015 at 3:04

  • Changed state: Fixed

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Ahh I see, on SR5 252 states you may know up to 2*RES, however SR5 98 states 
"Maximum number of complex forms at character creation equal to Logic 
Attribute" Thats where I was going from, so I see why you've done 2*RES. Now of 
course, on the same page it says sprites are limited by Charisma, rather than 
Logic. So what the true limit at CharGen is we shall never know. But I suppose 
it's a case of career vs. chargen at the very least.

Original comment by Chris.Tu...@gmail.com on 12 Mar 2015 at 3:39

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hmm. So it is. Well, those are easy enough to fix.

Original comment by chummer5isalive on 12 Mar 2015 at 3:53

  • Changed state: Started

@chummer5a chummer5a self-assigned this Mar 24, 2015
@chummer5a
Copy link
Owner

Resolved in 5.160.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants