Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider removing 'bunsen' from consumable component names #8

Closed
rox163 opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 12 comments
Closed

consider removing 'bunsen' from consumable component names #8

rox163 opened this issue Feb 29, 2016 · 12 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rox163
Copy link
Contributor

rox163 commented Feb 29, 2016

The consumer should be able to use 'frost-form' instead of 'frost-bunsen-form' for example.

@job13er
Copy link
Contributor

job13er commented Feb 29, 2016

As long as bunsen is in the repo/project name, I think it makes sense to have bunsen in the component name as well.

@rox163
Copy link
Contributor Author

rox163 commented Feb 29, 2016

Maybe when this repo is split out into two or more components, [as I think was originally planned], then we can look at naming.

@sglanzer-deprecated
Copy link
Contributor

My only goal with the naming of this project/component is making sure that people know what bunsen means - really we're talking about data-driven right?

@job13er
Copy link
Contributor

job13er commented Mar 1, 2016

Yes, which is why I had suggested we rename it when moving to open source, but, if I recall correctly, you said it works fine.

@sglanzer-deprecated
Copy link
Contributor

I'm comfortable with keeping the naming, we'll just stamp data-driven all over the docs. Bunsen will also be in the background for most things, the exception being forms (as it's currently written). When we look at making the projects more modular we may want to consider ember-frost-form with bunsen as the driver - kind of pitching here because I don't see a benefit in causing a ruckus about this right now.

@job13er
Copy link
Contributor

job13er commented Mar 1, 2016

Sounds good

@sandersky
Copy link
Contributor

@sglanzer can I close this issue?

@sglanzer-deprecated
Copy link
Contributor

@sandersky You can, but we should do some work to up the exposure of this project. As mentioned previously it's not categorized with forms in ember-observer and while it is highly rated I don't think it has been widely discovered yet.

Maybe we can raise some issues to:

  1. Add some more relevant keywords
  2. Fix the categorization on ember-observer
  3. Write a blog post to demonstrate the intent and usefulness of the project

Thoughts?

@sandersky
Copy link
Contributor

I agree, which brings me to one of my annual goals: to create a Ciena UX developer blog.

@job13er
Copy link
Contributor

job13er commented May 25, 2016

Also, let's clean up documentation before shining a light on it. It is an awesome library, but its documentation is far less awesome.

@sandersky
Copy link
Contributor

@job13er I couldn't agree more. I've made a couple attempts to improve it but there is just so much to document.

@sglanzer-deprecated
Copy link
Contributor

@EWhite613 has the blog setup, we just need to start writing content - he can provide details on how to write posts

@sandersky sandersky added this to the 7.0 milestone Aug 9, 2016
@sandersky sandersky self-assigned this Aug 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants