New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs, kpr, maglev: Move Maglev out of beta #19541
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll take a look (but it's more of a hostport issue the way it's pushing down svcs).
Needs more info indeed, and reporter also runs with DSR, not clear if related.
Yes, that is a virtio_net kernel issue, nothing to do with Maglev. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Judging from user reports the feature has seen a fair amount of usage.
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it |
@borkmann I think we should revive this PR for v1.12, i.e. to mark Maglev as stable. |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it |
@borkmann Should this be completed for v1.14? |
It has seen enough production exposure over the years and there are no known issues atm. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Recently also came up here https://cilium.slack.com/archives/C1MATJ5U5/p1688036113399879 . I've revived the PR so we can merge it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also add this to the table above under "eBPF networking"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given this is a subfeature of Kube-proxy Replacement
and Load Balancing
, I don't think it would be the right place to list there.
see commit msg.