New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): update cilium/coccicheck docker tag to v2.4 (v1.13) #27947
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <bot@renovateapp.com>
renovate
bot
added
kind/enhancement
This would improve or streamline existing functionality.
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
renovate/stop-updating
Tell Renovate to stop updating PR
labels
Sep 5, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
backport/1.13
This PR represents a backport for Cilium 1.13.x of a PR that was merged to main.
kind/backports
This PR provides functionality previously merged into master.
labels
Sep 5, 2023
github-actions
bot
added
the
kind/community-contribution
This was a contribution made by a community member.
label
Sep 5, 2023
viktor-kurchenko
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2023
/test-backport-1.13 |
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Sep 9, 2023
qmonnet
added a commit
to qmonnet/cilium
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] cilium#27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
nebril
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2023
In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] [ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not present in the v1.12 branch. ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] [ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not present in the v1.12 branch. ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ] [ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not present in the v1.12 branch. ] In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained no BPF-related changes. Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make sure we can catch similar issues in the future. [0] #27947 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/1.13
This PR represents a backport for Cilium 1.13.x of a PR that was merged to main.
kind/backports
This PR provides functionality previously merged into master.
kind/community-contribution
This was a contribution made by a community member.
kind/enhancement
This would improve or streamline existing functionality.
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
renovate/stop-updating
Tell Renovate to stop updating PR
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
2.3
->2.4
Configuration
π Schedule: Branch creation - "on monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
π¦ Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
β» Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
π Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.