Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update cilium/coccicheck docker tag to v2.4 (v1.13) #27947

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 9, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 5, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
cilium/coccicheck docker minor 2.3 -> 2.4

Configuration

πŸ“… Schedule: Branch creation - "on monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

β™» Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

πŸ”• Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <bot@renovateapp.com>
@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners September 5, 2023 09:58
@renovate renovate bot added kind/enhancement This would improve or streamline existing functionality. release-note/misc This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact. renovate/stop-updating Tell Renovate to stop updating PR labels Sep 5, 2023
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added backport/1.13 This PR represents a backport for Cilium 1.13.x of a PR that was merged to main. kind/backports This PR provides functionality previously merged into master. labels Sep 5, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the kind/community-contribution This was a contribution made by a community member. label Sep 5, 2023
@michi-covalent
Copy link
Contributor

/test-backport-1.13

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. label Sep 9, 2023
@michi-covalent michi-covalent merged commit 100b580 into v1.13 Sep 9, 2023
118 checks passed
@michi-covalent michi-covalent deleted the renovate/v1.13-all-github-action branch September 9, 2023 03:15
qmonnet added a commit to qmonnet/cilium that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2023
In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] cilium#27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
nebril pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2023
In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

[ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not
  present in the v1.12 branch. ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
giorio94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

[ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not
  present in the v1.12 branch. ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Donia <donia.cld@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
aanm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
[ upstream commit 071c2af ]

[ backporter's notes: skipped the hunk related to bpf_tests, as not
  present in the v1.12 branch. ]

In the past, we have merged automated updates to the coccicheck image
version (for example, [0]) without realising they may break the
workflow, because the workflow wouldn't run on the PR, which contained
no BPF-related changes.

Let's make the workflow run when its definition file is updated, to make
sure we can catch similar issues in the future.

[0] #27947

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Iorio <marco.iorio@isovalent.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/1.13 This PR represents a backport for Cilium 1.13.x of a PR that was merged to main. kind/backports This PR provides functionality previously merged into master. kind/community-contribution This was a contribution made by a community member. kind/enhancement This would improve or streamline existing functionality. ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. release-note/misc This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact. renovate/stop-updating Tell Renovate to stop updating PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants