New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
packer-ci: install newer llvm/clang from repo #200
Conversation
build-me-please |
build-next-please |
build-4.19 |
Building LLVM seems to fail due to out of mem or storage:
|
build-me-please |
build-next-please |
build-4.19 |
build-me-please |
build-next-please |
build-4.19 |
needs rebase |
For details see: cilium/cilium#10542 We also need to bump the memory size since clang/llvm build would otherwise fail due to being out of memory. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
build-me-please |
build-next-please |
build-4.19 |
- Pull in packer-ci upgrades for clang/llvm so it can run in CI cilium/packer-ci-build#200 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
- Pull in packer-ci upgrades for clang/llvm so it can run in CI cilium/packer-ci-build#200 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
- Pull in packer-ci upgrades for clang/llvm so it can run in CI cilium/packer-ci-build#200 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Pull in packer-ci upgrades for clang/llvm so it can run in CI: cilium/packer-ci-build#200 For now pull in only the net-next server box since our CI seems to have massive problems with disk space on nodes. This is currently being analyzed. We can bump SERVER_VERSION at a later point in time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Pull in packer-ci upgrades for clang/llvm so it can run in CI: cilium/packer-ci-build#200 For now pull in only the net-next server box since our CI seems to have massive problems with disk space on nodes. This is currently being analyzed. We can bump SERVER_VERSION at a later point in time. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
@borkmann Since we now use Clang to build the BPF unit tests, I think we will need to revert part of this PR (include the x86 Clang backend) to be able to run the unit tests in the dev. VMs. |
Makes sense, no objections. As long as we keep x86 out of the final Cilium runtime image, I'm all good. :-) |
For details see: cilium/cilium#10542
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net