-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chicago styles need to improve original-date and circa #4262
Comments
|
On point 1 (original date), yes, my apologies, I see "repr. ...".
|
On point 2 (circa) I don't think it is working for pandoc and chicago-fullnote-bibliography.csl.
yields
It just says "180AD" without any indication of circa... |
oh, that's circa on the original date. That's indeed not in the style. We can try to add that, too. No guarantee on how quick either of those are going to happen, but obviously happy to take PRs from you or anyone else. |
I've been searching the online CMS 17 and it only recognizes a "guessed at" date, with two different ways of representing it.
|
@adam3smith can you recommend an existing style that does circa on an old date? Looking around, it looks like this CSL:
picks up this type of yaml?
|
This issue hasn't seen any activity in the past 30 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs in the next two weeks. |
I'm waiting for my pull request to be considered. |
This issue hasn't seen any activity in the past 30 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs in the next two weeks. |
As discussed on the pandoc list:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: