Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove variable call from macro #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 27, 2020
Merged

Remove variable call from macro #33

merged 1 commit into from Jun 27, 2020

Conversation

bdarcus
Copy link
Member

@bdarcus bdarcus commented Jun 27, 2020

I'm not really sure if this is right, but ...

Except in rare cases, macros that render more than one element should
be avoided as sort keys, as they can lead to unexpected sorting in edge
cases. Instead, use their elements as individual, consecutive sort keys.

Closes #31

Except in rare cases, macros that render more than one element should 
be avoided as sort keys, as they can lead to unexpected sorting in edge 
cases. Instead, use their elements as individual, consecutive sort keys.

Closes #31
@bdarcus bdarcus requested a review from adam3smith June 27, 2020 17:59
@adam3smith adam3smith merged commit 685f076 into master Jun 27, 2020
@adam3smith
Copy link
Member

Thanks! That sentence (or a version of it) was intended for the specifications, though.

@bdarcus
Copy link
Member Author

bdarcus commented Jun 27, 2020 via email

@adam3smith
Copy link
Member

I think that worked correctly, yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question about sort_ConditionalMacroDates.txt
2 participants