Fix missing scope in habtm.rb

[Laykou]

Fixes #206

[Laykou]

@serprex Do you have an idea why tests are failing? It looks like there is Hash passed as attribute instead of the options?

Failure/Error: has_and_belongs_to_many_without_tenant(name, scope, **options, &extension)

NoMethodError:
  undefined method `arity' for {:tenant_column=>:account_id, :tenant_enabled=>true, :tenant_class_name=>"Account"}:Hash
# ./lib/activerecord-multi-tenant/habtm.rb:13:in `has_and_belongs_to_many_with_tenant'
# ./spec/schema.rb:177:in `<class:Manager>'
# ./spec/schema.rb:174:in `<top (required)>'
# ./spec/spec_helper.rb:85:in `<top (required)>'
# ./spec/activerecord-multi-tenant/associations_spec.rb:1:in `require'
# ./spec/activerecord-multi-tenant/associations_spec.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'

[serprex]

Yes. I'm not sure what's wrong

Looks like you found it tho

[Laykou]

I think I've figured that out here: b93088f

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #207 (b93088f) into master (5217915) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #207   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.68%   82.68%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         722      722           
=======================================
  Hits          597      597           
  Misses        125      125           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
lib/activerecord-multi-tenant/habtm.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[Laykou]

Tests are green now :)

[serprex]

Great. Can merge once you agree to CLA. Seemed like previous commits knew you'd agreed but now the ci action is acting up

[Laykou]

I think I did that but I'm not sure. What else should I do?

[serprex]

Could you try posting @microsoft-github-policy-service agree again? Or push a fresh commit to try get it to recheck. I can't seem to re-run it from action overview

[Laykou]

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

[Laykou]

Would you be willing to release this as a new version please so that I don't have to pull gem from master branch? Thank you