Add cross-reference hyperlink within "importing your data"

[twomice]

For example, the Importing Data into CiviCRM (line 16 in the page source) says

please read the section on "Organizing your data"

but this section doesn't exist in the book. (I think. I did search for it.)

Obviously we could just go ahead and migrate the wiki page, but short of that is there an interim quick-fix to minimize confusion until that page is migrated?

[michaelmcandrew]

Hey there, Here's the organising your data section: https://docs.civicrm.org/user/en/latest/organising-your-data/overview/ - English spelling :) Might be that there is useful stuff in that wiki page. If you have the time, a quick review of them both and pulling in the relevant stuff would be great. And it would be great to delete that wiki page once we've made sure we aren't missing any gems. Michael

…

On 05/05/17 20:13, Allen Shaw wrote: For example, the Importing Data into CiviCRM <https://docs.civicrm.org/user/en/4.7/common-workflows/importing-data-into-civicrm/> (line 16 in the page source <https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-user-guide/blame/master/docs/common-workflows/importing-data-into-civicrm.md#L16>) says please read the section on "Organizing your data" but this section doesn't exist in the book. (I think. I did search for it.) Obviously we could just go ahead and migrate the wiki page <https://wiki.civicrm.org/confluence/display/CRMDOC/Organizing+Your+Data>, but short of that is there an interim quick-fix to minimize confusion until that page is migrated? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#174>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM0L7TS59Dt1N3AniYpEwjwaVQApIXVks5r23TMgaJpZM4NSUDs>.

-- Michael McAndrew https://thirdsectordesign.org skype: michaelmcandrew tel: 01884 228248 (UK) mob: 07477 665458 (UK)

[twomice]

Ah, thanks for the spelling "correction" @michaelmcandrew . I didn't think of that.

So, are we aiming to avoid links between sections? That is, do we have a reason not to make a hyperlink out of the text that mentions that section?

[michaelmcandrew]

You can go ahead and add a link (and remove any guidance that says you shouldn't - we used to advise not to due to limitations of the previous system)

…

On 6 May 2017 6:18 pm, "Allen Shaw" ***@***.***> wrote: Ah, thanks for the spelling "correction" @michaelmcandrew <https://github.com/michaelmcandrew> . I didn't think of that. So, are we aiming to avoid links between sections? That is, do we have a reason not to make a hyperlink out of the text that mentions that section? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#174 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM0L1LIxY8Mhh8fNpZp1ZjNOXIU5GpXks5r3KtkgaJpZM4NSUDs> .

[seancolsen]

Summary of next steps needed:

See this section where it says "please read". Add a hyperlink there which points to /organising-your-data/mapping-your-data