You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, a usage of an implicit template specialization is stored as a ref to the template decl in the index.
It would be useful to be able to find references to a specific specialization only, even if it's an implicit specialization. This would require creating distinct symbols for implicit specializations, with their own refs.
It is important to note that this likely implies a huge size increse in index. So would be nice to see some numbers with a quick prototype, if someone decides to implement this in the future.
Currently, a usage of an implicit template specialization is stored as a ref to the template decl in the index.
It would be useful to be able to find references to a specific specialization only, even if it's an implicit specialization. This would require creating distinct symbols for implicit specializations, with their own refs.
This suggestion originally came up here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: