-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider creating 'Parameterized tests' #38
Comments
That looks pretty cool! |
Any plans? |
I don't have any current plans, no. I have lots of other things going on at the moment. I'd be happy to review a pull request if you or someone else would like to take a stab at it! |
Ok. I will try to do it, when i find some time. ;) |
I'm not the author obviously :), but green is a test runner. It's annoying when things reinvent this sort of thing -- there are libraries that do this, and they should (I expect) work with green. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/testscenarios is one, and I'm fairly sure I've ran green on test suites that use it successfully (although I use a fork of testscenarios which is even more likely to work with green). |
Okay, we now support nose's parameterized tests in theory. Give it a try and let me know how it actually goes in practice. I'll consider this fixed unless I hear otherwise. |
Parameterized tests are the only one feature that i miss in green.
or
http://nose2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/params.html
https://github.com/nose-devs/nose2/blob/master/nose2/tools/params.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: