Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

git-python 1.0.3 #10059

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Contributor

Type: Missing

Summary:
git-python 1.0.3

Details:
Add BSD-3-Clause License

Resolution:
License Url:
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/master/LICENSE

Description:

Pull request generated by Microsoft tooling.

Affected definitions:

@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined.

@peggymoloney peggymoloney self-assigned this Mar 11, 2021
@peggymoloney
Copy link
Contributor

No License in Files

setup.py has no License

No License in Download files

Curate as NONE

@ariel11
Copy link
Contributor

ariel11 commented Mar 12, 2021

@peggymoloney - I think I agree with NONE, as the package does not have any license info and it links to a repo (https://github.com/pynickle/git-python) without any license info. What is in the package/repo may come from here (https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython), however as far as the package goes, I agree with "NONE" for the "Declared" license. Do you agree @capfei ?

@ariel11
Copy link
Contributor

ariel11 commented Mar 18, 2021

@nellshamrell - there seems to be a bug with merging "NONE."

@capfei capfei closed this Mar 18, 2021
@capfei capfei reopened this Mar 18, 2021
@ariel11 ariel11 added the issue There is a tooling or process based issue or question. label Mar 18, 2021
@peggymoloney
Copy link
Contributor

@nellshamrell Hi Nell, can you fix the bug with "NONE" as declared license so we can merge please.

Thanks.
Peggy

@nellshamrell
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #11160

@nellshamrell
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @peggymoloney! Looks like the bug was fixed, but we need to open a new pull request in order for the validation to pass. I opened a new one at #11160

@capfei capfei deleted the clearlydefinedbot_210311_193305.397 branch June 15, 2021 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue There is a tooling or process based issue or question.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants