-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
git-python 1.0.3 #10059
git-python 1.0.3 #10059
Conversation
You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined. |
No License in Files setup.py has no License No License in Download files Curate as NONE |
@peggymoloney - I think I agree with NONE, as the package does not have any license info and it links to a repo (https://github.com/pynickle/git-python) without any license info. What is in the package/repo may come from here (https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython), however as far as the package goes, I agree with "NONE" for the "Declared" license. Do you agree @capfei ? |
@nellshamrell - there seems to be a bug with merging "NONE." |
@nellshamrell Hi Nell, can you fix the bug with "NONE" as declared license so we can merge please. Thanks. |
Closing in favor of #11160 |
Hi @peggymoloney! Looks like the bug was fixed, but we need to open a new pull request in order for the validation to pass. I opened a new one at #11160 |
Type: Missing
Summary:
git-python 1.0.3
Details:
Add BSD-3-Clause License
Resolution:
License Url:
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/master/LICENSE
Description:
Pull request generated by Microsoft tooling.
Affected definitions: