matplotlib 3.4.0

[clearlydefinedbot]

Type: Missing

Summary:
matplotlib 3.4.0

Details:
Add 0BSD License

Resolution:
License Url:
https://matplotlib.org/stable/devel/license.html

Description:

Pull request generated by Microsoft tooling.

Affected definitions:

• matplotlib 3.4.0

[clearlydefinedbot]

You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined.

[AE49]

@capfei This could be Declared as PSF-2.0. PyPI metadata is PSF. The license is a close enough match with references to PSF and Python customized, but main licensing text was not changed. https://matplotlib.org/stable/users/license.html. Thoughts?

https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/blob/v3.4.0/LICENSE/LICENSE

[capfei]

@ariel11 I do see that only the author information was changes and the copyright years, which, in most cases, we would accept as being that license. I'm not sure about the part referring versions prior to 1.3.0. Do we count that as part of the full license text or treat it individually?

@ariel11 What do you think?

[ariel11]

@AE49 and @capfei - The Matplotlib license does not currently meet the SPDX matching guidelines as the author text is not in colored font - https://spdx.org/licenses/PSF-2.0.html. I think it should be in colored font and I can submit that request to SPDX. It looks like we curated a different version of Matplotlib as OTHER.

I found this issue has been raised with SPDX (spdx/license-list-XML#1104) and it sounds like the author and date text will be changed to colored font. If that is the case, then I think PSF-2.0 would work here.

[AE49]

@ariel11 @capfei Are we waiting first on the SPDX resolution or should I merge this PR now with PSF-2.0 as the Declared License?

[ariel11]

@AE49 - My suggestion would be to proceed with PSF-2.0

[capfei]

I tried to fix these but it keeps failing. Added to #11048

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved.

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved.

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

[clearlydefinedbot]

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

2.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.0.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.2.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.2 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.3 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.3.4 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.0 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
3.4.1 licensed.declared with value "PSF-2.0" is not SPDX compliant