New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bandit issues (Sourcery refactored) #88
Conversation
The file parsing does not note encoding caveats. Included this for people using files with unicode encoding. A kludge for now till proper from_file method is introduced.
Add caveat for parsing files from disk
Switched broken pypip.in badges to shields.io
PyPI uses markdawn on default, so you should set description content type.
Show the description correctly on PyPI
Hello @sourcery-ai[bot]! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
|
Sourcery Code Quality Report (beta)Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! |
Everything looks good |
Pull Request #87 refactored by Sourcery.
Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.
To incorporate these changes, you can either:
Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or
Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
the original Pull Request
Incorporate changes via command line
NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin: