Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(clerk-js): Update existing SignUp object on SignUpContinue OAuth #3401

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/loud-tables-rush.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
'@clerk/clerk-js': patch
---

A bug was fixed to not override the existing sign-up state on the OAuth callback.

When continuing a sign-up flow with social connections, `@clerk/clerk-js` was creating a new `SignUpResource` object, instead of patching the existing one.

This was affecting Web3 sign-up flows, since the wallet ID was being overridden on the browser redirect.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ function _SignUpContinue() {
<SignUpSocialButtons
enableOAuthProviders={showOauthProviders}
enableWeb3Providers={showWeb3Providers}
continueSignUp
Copy link
Member Author

@LauraBeatris LauraBeatris May 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

const authenticateFn = (args: SignUpCreateParams | SignUpUpdateParams) =>
continueSignUp && this.id ? this.update(args) : this.create(args);

Since continueSignUp wasn't being provided, then a new SignUp object was created on the redirect.

Copy link
Member Author

@LauraBeatris LauraBeatris May 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might be missing other flows here and this could end up introducing side effects, so please let me know 馃檱馃徎

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

鉂揝houldn't the absence of continueSignUp create issues for the rest of oath providers ? Did we verify that those were failing as well, because if they were successful that would seem weird.

Copy link
Member Author

@LauraBeatris LauraBeatris May 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

create issues for the rest of oath providers

Good point, I haven't verified yet - what are other flows that someone could fall on ContinueSignUp?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have verified (offline) that flows work as expected

/>
)}
<SignUpForm
Expand Down
Loading