Wonderful, but inconsistent "Currently Doesn't Exist:" section

[cspaniard]

I am really divided on this one. I really like the "Currently Doesn't Exist:" section. However, it is only used for the "Excluded Sources:" side of things.

The "Included Sources:" section deals with missing assets in a different way.

Included Sources:

Directories:
---------------------------------------------
[...]
/lib32/ ... skipping - DOESN'T EXIST!
[...]

Files:
---------------------------------------------
/home/dsanroma/missing_file ... skipping - DOESN'T EXIST!

Where the "Excluded Sources:` section has it own section

Excluded Sources:
[...]

Currently Doesn't Exist:
---------------------------------------------
/directory with spaces/test4/ ... not on system
[...]

Furthermore, the wording and capitalization are also different " - DOESN'T EXIST!" vs "not on system".

I have no idea what I would do about this one... I just wanted to point it out. ;)

Maybe the differences could be smoothed out a little... ;)

[cleverwise]

I already changed wording to not on system for both sections in 2.3.3

The currently doesn't exist is to let the user know even though you have excluded said source it will be skipped anyway because it isn't there.

[cspaniard]

I agree, and it shows in one nice list...

[cspaniard]

Check -> OK as described.