Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable optimize_rewrite_sum_if_to_count_if if return type is nullable (new analyzer) #61389

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

antonio2368
Copy link
Member

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/clickhouse-test-reports/0/0b97f3ac16507cd72ed4e33739d355d16a48a741/ast_fuzzer__tsan_.html

In old analyzer it was disabled because toNullable is a function and not ASTLiteral.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ class SumIfToCountIfVisitor : public InDepthQueryTreeVisitorWithContext<SumIfToC
return;

auto * function_node = node->as<FunctionNode>();
if (!function_node || !function_node->isAggregateFunction())
if (!function_node || !function_node->isAggregateFunction() || function_node->getResultType()->isNullable())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This reminds me of f0354ee.

Both bugs are introduced because getValue() ignores nullability.

Probably constant_value_literal.getType() should be changed to literal->getResultType(), and getType() should be refactored to something with a completely different name to avoid this confusion again as getResultType() and getType() and pretty much identical and getType() does unexpected things. Thoughts?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes it was confusing at first when reading the code because you don't pay attention to the fact that the Nullability info is lost when you get Field
not sure what would be the best solution

@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label Mar 14, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll3
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll3 commented Mar 14, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 060f798 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants