Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IceStorm compatibility? #77

Closed
sunnystormy opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

IceStorm compatibility? #77

sunnystormy opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@sunnystormy
Copy link

Heya!

Wanted to reach out and see if this would be compatible with a BlackIce board? I'd love to use the IceStorm tools to get this running!

Thank you!

@cliffordwolf
Copy link
Collaborator

It is compatible witrh IceStorm of course. For example the demo for picosoc is an iCE40 HX8K design that being built with icestorm.

I don't know if there is an already existing picorv32/picosoc design for the BlackIce board, but since the board features a iCE40HX4K (which is just a 8k with a different label) I see no inherent issue with getting picorv32 work on that board.

@ndbroadbent
Copy link

ndbroadbent commented Nov 22, 2018

Hi @cliffordwolf, I'm also interested in running picorv32 on an iCE40 FPGA. I saw this in the README: "Small (750-2000 LUTs)". So I was wondering if you can build a minimal version that will run on an iCE40HX1K with 1,280 LUTs?

Chip LUTs
iCE40HX1K 1,280
iCE40HX4K 3,520
iCE40HX8K 7,680

(From this iCE40 datasheet.)

I'm collecting some information to update my post on /r/FPGA about development boards. I've been looking at this affordable Go Board ($65), which has an iCE40HX1K. I'm just trying to get a sense of what you can do with it. It looks like it can run most of the soft-core CPU designs I've found, but only the stripped-down versions without too many features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants