Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solutions Explorer #106

Merged

Conversation

softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor

Adds Solutions Explorer interactive treemap visualization. Linked from Solutions Overview page.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Deploy Preview for ct-handbook-public ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d11c77d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ct-handbook-public/deploys/647f63ba1c20a300082e5492
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-106--ct-handbook-public.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2023-06-06 at 09 41 51
Screenshot 2023-06-06 at 09 42 03

@alexmayberry alexmayberry merged commit 638dda1 into climate-tech-handbook:main Jun 6, 2023
@futuresoup
Copy link
Member

@softwareengineerprogrammer @alexmayberry thanks for this! The only thing is that we are using a flat URL structure, so the page needs to be in the main /docs folder instead of docs/solutions

@softwareengineerprogrammer can you please move it there and call it solutions-explorer.md so the url is https://climatetechhandbook.com/solutions-explorer instead of climatetechhandbook.com/solutions/explorer

Then update the link to it on the main Solutions page.

That flat URLs are in case we need to migrate to a new system.

I also don't know what you did in the .gitignore but I trust that's okay.

@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #107 for moving to flat URL structure.

The change to ignore .idea is standard practice in my experience so it's okay in my book (I experimented with the selective ignore recommended by the github template but found it unsatisfactory)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants