Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating "Follow up" reasons in Chrome extension #35

Closed
dazzariti opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Updating "Follow up" reasons in Chrome extension #35

dazzariti opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dazzariti
Copy link

Heidi would like to replace the Follow Up Reason "Send to VCEP to review" with two options:
-Send to VCEP for full review
-Send to VCEP for triage

Current "Follow Up" Action reasons include
-Contact submitter for clarification
-Flag for another curator to review
-Send to VCEP to review (remove)
-Other

Request:

The "Follow Up" Action reasons list should look like this:
-Contact submitter for clarification
-Flag for another curator to review
-Send to VCEP for full review (new)
-Send to VCEP for triage (new)
-Other

@larrybabb
Copy link
Contributor

@dazzariti should I translate any existing "Send to VCEP to review" Follow up actions with one of the two new replacements? Or just leave them as-is?

Here's what's in the curated data so far...

SCV000892401.8 | CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | thought to be hypomorphic variant and should be assessed for macular dystrophy
SCV000546418.6 | Invitae | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review |  
SCV001136772.2 | Mendelics | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review |  
SCV001335308.1 | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Uncertain significance | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | See my email to RASopathy VCEP
SCV000194689.1 | Genetic Services Laboratory,University of Chicago | Pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | There is too much conflict for this variant. I can't mark anything noncontributory. VCEP should evaluate.
SCV002059080.1 | 3billion | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | Too much conflict; VCEP should evaluate.

larrybabb added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2022
@dazzariti
Copy link
Author

I would make the following"Send to VCEP for triage"

SCV000892401.8 | CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | thought to be hypomorphic variant and should be assessed for macular dystrophy
SCV000546418.6 | Invitae | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review |
SCV001136772.2 | Mendelics | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review |
SCV000194689.1 | Genetic Services Laboratory,University of Chicago | Pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | There is too much conflict for this variant. I can't mark anything noncontributory. VCEP should evaluate.
SCV002059080.1 | 3billion | Likely pathogenic | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | Too much conflict; VCEP should evaluate.

And this one "Send to VCEP for full review"

SCV001335308.1 | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Uncertain significance | Follow Up | Send to VCEP to review | See my email to RASopathy VCEP

larrybabb added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2022
@larrybabb
Copy link
Contributor

the updates to the above pre-existing curations have been made as requested. Once everyone has the new 1.9.3 chrome extension updated we should no longer capture the older reasons for the follow up actions.

@larrybabb
Copy link
Contributor

@dazzariti will verify the new release 1.9.3 and close this request if all is working as expected.

@dazzariti
Copy link
Author

Perfect!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants